Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Collection date | 04/15/2026 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology |
| Observations | I found this spider in a tree located at the front lawn of my school. The weather was fairly warm, and the temperature was increasing throughout the collection as it was roughly 9:30 am. I only collected one spider from this tree. |
| Putative identification | Arthropoda Arachnida Araneae Tetragnathidae Leucauge Leucauge venusta |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit |
| DNA extraction location | Body without legs |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | MiniPCR |
| Buffer | TBE |
| DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes | DNA extraction: I made sure to closely follow the protocol and crush up the arthropod really well. I cut off the legs of the spider and ground up the rest of the arthropod’s body. Analysis: My positive control did not work, however my negative control did. My sample did not have a band at all. There could have been a problem with my DNA extraction of the arthropod. |
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | No |
| Confidence level | Medium |
| Explanation of confidence level | Our positive control failed to produce a positive result, meaning it did not work as expected. I did not have any problems with the protocol, and I was not surprised by the band on the gel. I was only concerned that the positive control failed. Therefore, I have a medium level of confidence that our arthropod is not infected with Wolbachia. |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
| Arthropod COI sequence | Download AB1
|
| Summary | The Leucauge venusta was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |


Centipede – MJAR
Fruitfly – MJAR
Ant – MJAR
Mosquito – MJAR
Bumblebee – MJAR