Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 05/14/2024 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | California Academy of Mathematics and Science |
Observations | Ant caught on cement just outside entrance of CAMS |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Hymenoptera Formicidae Linepithema Linepithema humile |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | tweezers |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | UView |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | Both gels ran for just over an hour, before being examined for bands |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | Unknown |
Confidence level | Low |
Explanation of confidence level | The Wolbachia gel produced almost no evidence. The bands were either too faint to read or the DNA ran off the gel, presumably because of a PCR error causing the Wolbachia samples to not be amplified enough. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary |