Cylisticus Convexus

Sample information

Picture
Photos by: Hunter, G
Location
Collection date 09/30/2025
Captive / Cultivated? Wild-caught
Group Berkshire Community College
Observations
Found on my windowsill surrounded by leave debris.
Putative identification Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Cylisticidae Cylisticus Cylisticus convexus

Methods

Extraction kit Monarch DNA extraction (NEB)
DNA extraction location Abdomen
Single or Duplex PCR Duplex Reaction
Gel electrophoresis system Edvotek Gel Electrophoresis
Buffer 1X TAE
DNA stain SYBR Safe
Gel images
Protocol notes

We used a DNA extraction protocol based on the insect adaptation of New England Biolabs’ Monarch Spin gDNA Extraction Kit (Product # T3010).

The specimen was incubated for 30 minutes in a hot water bath at 56 degrees C.

Our first PCR reaction was set up on 10/14/2025 and was a duplex reaction because we used both the Arthropod CO1 and Wolbachia 16S primers together. We used an annealing temperature of 49 degrees Celsius. We used this Taq polymerase: New England Biolabs OneTaq Hot Start Quick Load 2X Master Mix with Standard Buffer (#M0488S)

Our first gel image was taken on 10/21/25 after our first PCR test and was run at 125 volts for 25 minutes. We used New England Biolabs 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder for Safe Staines (product # N0559S)

Our second second PCR reaction was set p on 10/28/25, used the same Taq polymerase as the first PCR reaction, and was a single reaction that used the Wolbachia F, R primers. We used an annealing temperature of 55 degrees Celsius.

Our second gel image was taken on 11/4/25 after our first PCR and was run at 125 volts for 20-25 minutes.  We used this DNA Ladder: New England Biolabs 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder for Safe Stains (product # N0559S)

Results

Wolbachia presence No
Confidence level Low
Explanation of confidence level

After our first PCR test, my arthropod was negative for Wolbachia, because there was no band presented. Both of our positive controls showed two bands, however my arthropod did not present any band at all. This suggests our results from DNA extraction likely did not work.

On our second PCR test ran on 11/4/25, our results showed a gel image with bands at 438 base pairs on every column, except the water column. This suggests cross contamination, likely in the PCR cocktail. The -C control should additionally not be showing up at 438 base pairs. This shows that while our PCR test worked correctly, the results are inconclusive.

Wolbachia 16S sequence
Arthropod COI sequence
Summary The Cylisticus convexus was found to be negative for Wolbachia.
Report Inappropriate Post