Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Collection date | 09/04/2025 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | Benedictine University |
| Observations |
|
| Putative identification | Arthropoda Insecta Orthoptera |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit |
| DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
| Buffer | TAE |
| DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes | Limiting as much debrief and contamination as we can during DNA extraction and purification. |
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | Unknown |
| Confidence level | Low |
| Explanation of confidence level | I would be much more confident of my results if our gel electrophoresis lab were successful. And this may be due to human or technical error playing a big part in seeing if the insects contained Wolbachia in the DNA. |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
| Arthropod COI sequence |
|
| Summary | |


Acanalonia conica
Caterpillar (Lepidoptera)
Scarites subterraneus