Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Collection date | 09/29/2025 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | Penn State University |
| Observations | The Camponotus pennsylvanicus specimen was collected at the Penn State Arboretum around 4:45 pm on September 29, 2025. At the time of collection, the weather conditions were partly cloudy with a temperature of 73º, which is pretty consistent with late summer conditions in State College, Pennsylvania. The ant was observed moving through soil and grass in a vast outdoor area with mixed greenery, plants, and flowers. Unlike expected behavior for this species, the ant was not observed interacting with a visible colony or following an ant trail. Instead, it appeared to be isolated. The specimen was notably small compared to typical Camponotus pennsylvanius ants. The specimen was identified using support from the Seek app, which matched morphological characteristic shared with carpenter ants. |
| Putative identification | Arthropoda |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
| DNA extraction location | Whole arthropod |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | MiniPCR |
| Buffer | TBE |
| DNA stain | GelGreen |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes | No major issues or errors occurred during DNA extraction, PCR, or gel electrophoresis, and all controls worked as expected, indicating the procedure ran correctly and contamination was unlikely. During the procedures, all controls performed as expected, with the positive control producing both host and Wolbachia bands and the negative control showing no bands. Lanes were identified is assigned order: Lane 1 DNA Ladder; Lanes 2-3 arthropod samples; Lane 4 Wolbachia-positive control; Lane 5 Wolbachia-negative control; Lane 6 positive PCR control; Lane 7 negative PCR control (water). DNA Extraction
Gel Electrophoresis
|
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | No |
| Confidence level | High |
| Explanation of confidence level | High confidence level because the controls worked as expected. The positive control showed the Wolbachia band, while the negative control showed no bands. The ant samples also had clear host DNA bands, indicating that the DNA extraction and PCR were successful. Since no Wolbachia band was detected in the ant samples, I am confident that Wolbachia DNA was not detected. However, because the experiment was only performed once, there is still a possibility of human error or other factors affecting the results. |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
| Arthropod COI sequence |
|
| Summary | The Arthropoda was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |


North American Wheel Bug
Cicurina (Meshweaver spider)
Tufted Clusterfly
Juvenile Pillbug