Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 11/01/2023 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | John Overton High School |
Observations |
This is the environment the beetle was caught in. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Coleoptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Duplex Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes |
DNA Extraction: Seeing that our controls don’t showcase any signs of DNA, I believe that part of the reason our arthropods don’t have any Wolbachia in them is because we didn’t crush them enough to extract the DNA. Gel Electrophoresis Lanes for CO1 arthropod PCR:
|
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | Medium |
Explanation of confidence level | The bands for my collected sample, Arthropod #2 weren’t visible for Wolbachia which led me to believe that we did a poor job at crushing our arthropods up in the very beginning. This made our results inaccurate.
|
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Coleoptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |