Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | No map location data available. |
| Collection date | 09/03/2025 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | Benedictine University |
| Observations | Was caught using a net and then submerged in an ethanol based solution to preserve DNA. End results showed to have no Wolbachia. |
| Putative identification | Arthropoda |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | pcr |
| DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | agarose gel electrophoresis |
| Buffer | lysis |
| DNA stain | |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes |
|
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | No |
| Confidence level | Medium |
| Explanation of confidence level | The DNA concentration results proved to be much higher than the standard amount which may suggest there was either protein or salt contamination present in the DNA sample |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | Download FASTA
TATTATGCTGATAGAGATAGGATCTCCCCCTCCTGCTGGATCAAAAAATGAAGTATTTAAATTACGATCAGTTAGTAATATAGTGATTGCACCAGCTAATACAGGTAAAGAAAGTAATAATAAAAATGCTGTAATTCCCACTGCTCAAATAAATAAAGGTATTTGATCAAAGGATAAATTATTTAATCGTATATTAATAATTGTTGTGATAAAATTAATTGCACCTAAGATTGATGAGATTCCTGCTAAATGAAGAGAAAAGATAGCAAGATCTACTGAACTTCCAGCGTGAGCAATATTAGAAGAAAGTGGGGGGTAGACTGTTCATCCTGTTCCTGCTCCATTTTCTACAATTCTACTTGAGATTAATAAAGTGAGAGATGGGGGTAATAATCAGAAGCTTATATTATTTATTCGAGGGAAGGCTATATCAGGTGCTCCTAATATTAAAGGTACTAATCAATTACCAAATCCTCCAATTATAATAGGTATAACTATAAAAAAAATTATAATGAAAGCATGAGCTGTGACAATAGTATTATAAATTTGATCATCTCCAATTAAAGATCCAGGATTACCTAATTCAGCTCGAATTAATAATCTTAGAGAAGTTCCTACTATACCTGCTCAAATACCAAAAATAAAATATAATGTTCCAATATCTTTTCCCCACCTATCATCTTCTTTTTTTAAACTGCCTCAGTTGATGATGAAACATTAGTGAGG
BLAST at The Wolbachia Project BLAST at NCBI
|
| Arthropod COI sequence |
|
| Summary | The Arthropoda was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |


Pill Bug (Armadillidium vulgare) – Draft
Melanoplus Femurrubrum
Grasshopper – Orthoptera
Aboud kanama