Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Collection date | 04/21/2026 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | California Academy of Mathematics and Science |
| Observations | This sand crab was found in the sand near the shore of Redondo Beach Pier, in a small hole produced by the sand crab. It was collected in the afternoon, at ~4:30 pm. The weather was partly cloudy and about 68 degrees Fahrenheit. Many sand crabs populated the area. |
| Putative identification | Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Hippidae Emerita Emerita analoga |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
| DNA extraction location | Partial abdomen |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Duplex Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | Mini-Sub Cell GT Horizontal Electrophoresis System |
| Buffer | 1X TAE |
| DNA stain | UV Stain |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes | Description:
|
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | No |
| Confidence level | Medium |
| Explanation of confidence level | Since there’s a 52% chance that a mole crab could be infected with Wolbachia, given the small sample size (one specimen per species) of the experiment, there is a possibility that the mole crab tested was actually infected with Wolbachia. However, since the positive control (with Wolbachia and arthropod DNA) showed up on the gel, it was reasonable to conclude that the mole crab’s gel results were valid, and therefore that the mole crab was Wolbachia negative. Additionally, since there was no viable Sanger sequence of the mole crab, we cannot confirm the gel electrophoresis results with alternate methods. |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
| Arthropod COI sequence |
|
| Summary | The Emerita analoga was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |




Centipede – MJAR
Fruitfly – MJAR
Ant – MJAR
Mosquito – MJAR
Bumblebee – MJAR