Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 08/27/2024 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Georgia Southern University |
Observations |
|
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Hemiptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | |
DNA extraction location | Partial abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | Other |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | DNA extraction kit of in-house reagents was used. |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | Medium |
Explanation of confidence level | My confidence level was medium because although I predicted that my insect might be infected with Wolbachia based on some initial signs or assumptions, I wasn’t fully certain. After analyzing data from different articles related to my Insect Order and even local data graphs, it became clear that Wolbachia was not going to be highly present in this insect species. This reflects the inherent uncertainty that can come with predicting the presence of an infection based on indirect or limited evidence. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
AGCAGGTATAGTAGGATCCGCTATAAGACTAATTATCCGAATCGAACTAG GACAACCAGGAAGATTCATTGGAGATGATCAAATTTATAACGTAATCGTA ACAGCTCACGCCTTCGTAATAATTTTCTTCATAGTAATACCTATTATAAT TGGAGGATTTGGAAACTGACTAGTTCCCCTAATAATCGGAGCTCCCGACA TAGCATTCCCTCGTATAAATAACATAAGATTTTGATTATTACCTCCTTCA TTAACATTATTAATAATAAGTAGACTAGCAGAATCAGGAGCTGGAACCGG ATGAACAGTTTACCCTCCTTTATCAAGTAATTTATCCCACAGAGGAGCAT CCGTAGACTTAGCAATTTTTTCACTCCACTTAGCCGGAGTATCTTCAATC TTGGGAGCAGTAAATTTTATTTCCACAATCATTAATATACGACCCGCAGG AATAATCCCTGAACGAATTCCTTTATTTGTATGATCAGTAGGGATTACTG CCTTACTTCTACTACTATCATTACCTGTGCTAGCAGGTGCTATTACAATA TTATTAACTGATCGAAATTTTAACACATCATTTTTCGATCCCTCAGGTGG AGGAGACCCTATTTTATACCAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTT
BLAST at The Wolbachia Project BLAST at NCBI
|
Summary | The Hemiptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |