Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 09/19/2024 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Palm Beach Atlantic University |
Observations | |
Putative identification | Arthropoda |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | pcr |
DNA extraction location | Whole arthropod |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | Other |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | Gel electrophoresis only occurred for 15 minutes due to time constraints |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | Yes |
Confidence level | Medium |
Explanation of confidence level | Ant 1 is thought to be positive due to a faint fragment 600BP in size while the positive Wolbachia control and Wolbachia DNA have a fragment 560BP in size. Due to the short time of electrophoresis, it is difficult to confirm if this fragment is a similar size as theĀ positive control and Wolbachia DNA. Ant 2 had no banding associated with Wolbachia and thus was negative. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Arthropoda was found to be postive for Wolbachia. |