Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 08/29/2024 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Georgia Southern University |
Observations | Time of day: 2:30pm – 3:10pm Weather conditions: 99 degrees – High 90 degrees Low 76 degrees – 68% Humidity 8 mph Wind – 20 Air Index Used a tray and jar to collect the insect. Found in a semi-dry environment; in the woods near a pond. The earwig was collected from a fallen tree branch. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Dermaptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | |
DNA extraction location | |
Single or Duplex PCR | |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | Other |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | DNA extraction kit of in-house reagents was used. |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | High |
Explanation of confidence level | I am confident that the results are correct due to the correctness of the positive, negative, and no template controls. I am also confident that there was no cross contamination between the two samples as they were both negative and that couldn’t be possible if one had Wolbachia and there was contamination. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Dermaptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |