Sample information |
|
| Picture |
|
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Collection date | 04/22/2026 |
| Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
| Group | Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology |
| Observations | This spider was caught by the stream near TJHSST. It was slightly drizzling at the time of capture, and it was found in a large pile of leaves and twigs near the stream at around 11:30 am. |
| Putative identification | Arthropoda |
Methods |
|
| Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit |
| DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
| Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
| Gel electrophoresis system | MiniPCR |
| Buffer | TBE |
| DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
| Gel images |
|
| Protocol notes | Majority of our data did not result in visible bands which could be due to a lack of Wolbachia, or reagents that weren’t working properly. We can also see the negative control in the arthropod DNA showing up, which means something went wrong during the protocol. |
Results |
|
| Wolbachia presence | No |
| Confidence level | Low |
| Explanation of confidence level | Our arthropod DNA gel electrophoresis resulted in our negative control to show up, which isn’t supposed to happen, causing the rest of the results to be deemed invalid. More than that, no other sample had a clear band for the arthropod DNA. For the Wolbachia, the positive and negative controls did work properly, but due to the inconsistencies of the arthropod DNA, we are not too confident in our results.
For the fasta and ab1 upload, I’m not uploading anything because I didn’t get any viable DNA or Wolbachia levels from the gel electrophoresis. |
| Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
| Arthropod COI sequence |
|
| Summary | The Arthropoda was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |


Centipede – MJAR
Fruitfly – MJAR
Ant – MJAR
Mosquito – MJAR
Bumblebee – MJAR