Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 03/30/2022 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Richmond High School |
Observations | The roly-polys were together under a log, where it was cold and wet. The roly-polys liked to stay away from sunlight, mostly likely in dry and dark places in the dirt. I observed that it had 7 sets of legs, a hard plated dark grey exoskeleton, an oval body, and curled into a ball when touched, so I was able to identify that it was a pillbug. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Crustacea Malacostraca Isopoda Armadillidae Armadillidium Armadillidium vulgare |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | Thermoscientific GeneJet Genomic Purification |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Duplex Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Edvotek Gel Electrophoresis |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | I think that the DNA was not thoroughly cleaned and that enough was pulled out of the cells in the reproductive tissues of my arthropod. |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | Unknown |
Confidence level | High |
Explanation of confidence level | Through gel electrophoresis, I saw that my pill bug tested inconclusive for Wolbachia because the RFLPS for my arthropod DNA did not show when we interpreted the gel under a fluorescent light. Because of the temperature and the way the gel was loaded with the small amount of DNA from my pillbug, I was unable to see if my arthropod was negative or positive for Wolbachia. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary |