Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 03/16/2022 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | River Valley Community College |
Observations | Found indoors. Wings/Shell removed before DNA extraction. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Hemiptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | MiniOne |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | GelRed |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | High |
Explanation of confidence level | I am very confident in this sample not having Wolbachia present. Our controls for detecting the amplification of Wolbachia DNA all worked well, there was zero evidence of an issue during the extraction step either. The only controls that had problems were our controls for the Arthropod CO1 DNA that was most likely hindered during the PCR prep phase. Most likely theory is poor mixing between the DNA and the primer used to amplify the CO1 sequence in our controls. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence | Download AB1
ACAAATTACTTTATCTTCGGATATGATCTGGAATAGTAGGATCAGCTATAAGATTAATTATCCGTATCGAATTAGGACAGCCTGGAAGATTTATTGGTAATGATCAAATTTATAATGTAATTGTAACAGCACATGCATTTGTAATAATTTTCTTTATAGTAATACCAATCATAATTGGAGGATTCGGTAATTGATTAGTCCCTTTAATAATTGGAGCACCTGATATAGCCTTCCCACGATTAAATAATATAAGATTCTGATTATTACCCCCTTCATTAACTTTATTATTAATAAGAAGAATAGCAGAATCAGGAGCTGGGACAGGATGAACAGTCTATCCCCCCTTATCAAGTAATATCTCACATAGAGGAGCATCAGTTGATTTAGCTATTTTTTCCTTACATTTGGCTGGGGTTTCATCAATTTTAGGGGCAGTAAATTTTATTTCAACTATTATAAATATACGACCAACAGGTATAACCCCTGAACGAATCCCATTGTTTGTGTGATCAGTAGGAATTACTGCACTTCTTCTGTTATTATCCTTACCTGTGTTAGCAGGTGCTATTACTATACTATTAACTGACCGAAATTTTAATACCTCTTTTTTTGACCCATCAGGAGGAGGAGACCCTATTCTTTATCAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGGTCACCCTGGAAAGTTTAA
BLAST at The Wolbachia Project BLAST at NCBI
|
Summary | The Hemiptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |