Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 09/06/2024 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Edmund Burke School |
Observations | I found the arthropod in a small park under a rock during the fall. it was about 75 degrees outside. The arthropod was in a terrestrial habitat. It is gray, and has many legs.
|
Putative identification | Arthropoda Myriapoda Chilopoda Lithobiomorpha Lithobiidae Lithobius Lithobius forficatus |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
DNA extraction location | Whole arthropod |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | MiniOne |
Buffer | TBE |
DNA stain | GelGreen |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | DNA Extraction: I made sure to crush the arthropod really well, the arthropod was small, so no dissection was necessary Gel Electrophoresis, arthropod CO1: 1 – DNA ladder 2 – A4 DNA 3 – A5 DNA 4- A6 DNA 5 – Arthropod positive control 6 – Arthropod negative control 7 – water Analysis: all controls showed expected bands, and the sample showed a arthropod CO1 band. Gel electrophoresis, Wolbachia: 1 – DNA ladder 2 – A4 DNA 3 – A5 DNA 4- A6 DNA 5 – Wolbachia positive control 6 – wolbachia negative control 7 – water Analysis: all controls showed expected bands, and the sample did not show a wolbachia band.
|
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | High |
Explanation of confidence level | All of my controls worked as expected. I did not have any problems |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Lithobius forficatus was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |