Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 09/14/2022 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Woburn Memorial High School |
Observations | – mosquito had a long physique and long legs |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Diptera Culicidae |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | Edwards Buffer |
DNA extraction location | Partial abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Duplex Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | MiniOne |
Buffer | TBE |
DNA stain | GelGreen |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | – cut off abdomen of mosquito in order to use the sex organs to find Wolbachia – Cell lysis the DNA of the insect and then precipitate the DNA – Then drain the DNA pellets in absorb the supernatant for PCR testing – after running PCR use the DNA to run a 2% agarose gel electrophoresis – Well 1: Ladder (100 bp) – compare results with control DNA in order to identify wolbachia in the insect |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | Yes |
Confidence level | Medium |
Explanation of confidence level | I believe that there is no Wolbachia is in the mosquito. It is clear that there is no Wolbachia band below the arthropod band. However there was an indication of cross contamination, meaning not all results may be accurate |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Culicidae was found to be postive for Wolbachia. |