Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 11/01/2023 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | John Overton High School |
Observations | Most of the insects collected, specifically beetles, were found under logs; so, dark, small, and hidden places. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Coleoptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Duplex Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | Standard electrophoresis system |
Buffer | TAE |
DNA stain | SYBR Safe |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | DNA Extraction: I took great care to thoroughly crush the arthropod, as well as removing the abdomen, leaving the exoskeleton behind. Gel Electrophoresis Lanes for CO1 arthropod PCR:
|
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | Medium |
Explanation of confidence level | After receiving the results from the samples collected and tested, the bands for my collected sample, Arthropod #3, weren’t visible for Wolbachia. On the other hand, the bands for Arthropod #4 and the (+) Arthropod Control were both visible for Wolbachia. The controls did show signs of success, still, I’d rather consult with scientists who were present before I come to a solid conclusion. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Coleoptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |