Sample information |
|
Picture |
|
---|---|
Location | |
Collection date | 09/08/2022 |
Captive / Cultivated? | Wild-caught |
Group | Edmund Burke School |
Observations | I found this earwig crawling on concrete outside. I collected it at night, near midnight, and it was 64°F. |
Putative identification | Arthropoda Hexapoda Insecta Dermaptera |
Methods |
|
Extraction kit | DNeasy (Qiagen) |
DNA extraction location | Abdomen |
Single or Duplex PCR | Single Reaction |
Gel electrophoresis system | MiniOne |
Buffer | TBE |
DNA stain | GelGreen |
Gel images |
|
Protocol notes | DNA extraction: I made sure to crush the arthropod really well. I dissected the abdomen out. Gel Electrophoresis Lanes: For CO1 Arthropod PCR 1- 10Kb ladder 2- The second well is my first sample 3- The third well is my second sample 4- The fourth well is my third sample 5- The fifth well is my fourth sample 6- The sixth well is my negative Arthropod DNA 7- The seventh well is my positive Arthropod DNA 8- The eighth well is my positive Wolbachia DNA 9- The ninth well is my overall negative Gel Electrophoresis Lanes: For Wolbachia Specific Gene PCR 1- 10Kb ladder 2- The second well is my first sample 3- The third well is my second sample 4- The fourth well is my fourth sample 5- The fifth well is my third sample 6- The sixth well is my positive Arthropod DNA 7- The seventh well is my negative Arthropod DNA 8- The eighth well is my positive Wolbachia DNA 9- The ninth well is water, and thus negative overall |
Results |
|
Wolbachia presence | No |
Confidence level | High |
Explanation of confidence level | I’m confident in our results because the controls that were supposed to be positive were positive but our samples were not, indicating that our samples were not positive for Wolbachia. Unfortunately, the earwig did not have a bright enough band from the gel electrophoresis to have the DNA sequenced. |
Wolbachia 16S sequence | |
Arthropod COI sequence |
|
Summary | The Dermaptera was found to be negative for Wolbachia. |